Skip to main content
Detailed comparison

MonitorGiant vs Uptime Kuma

Uptime Kuma is a brilliant self-hosted monitoring tool — but self-hosted means you're on the hook for the server, the updates, and the reliability. MonitorGiant is fully managed SaaS: no server, no maintenance, no irony of your monitoring tool going offline.

Fully managed
No server needed
MonitorGiant is SaaS — sign up and monitor in minutes. Uptime Kuma needs a VPS or Docker host you maintain.
Built-in
Multi-region checks
MonitorGiant verifies from multiple locations to eliminate false positives. Uptime Kuma checks from a single server.
Status pages
Where Uptime Kuma leads
Uptime Kuma has polished status pages and push/heartbeat monitors built in. MonitorGiant does not include these.

The self-hosted irony

Uptime Kuma runs on the same server it's meant to monitor. When that server goes down, so does your monitoring — and your alerts. MonitorGiant runs independently of your infrastructure, so a total outage still reaches you.

Feature by feature.

Feature MonitorGiant Uptime Kuma Winner
Hosted / managed SaaS ✓ Yes — no server needed ✗ Self-hosted only MonitorGiant
Free to start Free (25 monitors) Free (own server required) Tie
HTTP monitoring ✓ Yes ✓ Yes Tie
Keyword monitoring ✓ All plans ✓ Yes Tie
Port / TCP monitoring ✓ Yes ✓ Yes Tie
Ping monitoring ✓ Yes ✓ Yes Tie
SSL expiry monitoring Paid plan ✓ Yes (free) Uptime Kuma
Push / heartbeat monitors ✗ Not included ✓ Yes Uptime Kuma
Status pages ✗ Not included ✓ Yes (built-in) Uptime Kuma
Multi-region checks ✓ Yes ✗ Single region only MonitorGiant
30-second intervals Paid plan ✓ Yes Tie
Multi-organisation ✓ Yes — built-in ✗ No MonitorGiant
Google OAuth ✓ Yes ✗ No MonitorGiant
Server maintenance ✗ None — fully managed ✓ You manage it MonitorGiant
Response time charts ✓ Yes ✓ Yes Tie
Incident history Full history retained ✓ Yes Tie
AI token monitoring ✓ Yes (paid add-on) ✗ No MonitorGiant
Cloud cost monitoring ✓ Yes (paid add-on) ✗ No MonitorGiant
MCP health monitoring ✓ Yes (paid add-on) ✗ No MonitorGiant
Platform health monitoring ✓ Yes (paid add-on) ✗ No MonitorGiant

When Uptime Kuma might be the right choice

  • You need full data sovereignty — nothing leaves your own infrastructure
  • You already run a reliable, always-on server and want zero ongoing SaaS costs
  • You need status pages or push / heartbeat monitors out of the box
  • You prefer open-source tools you can customise and self-manage
  • You're monitoring a local or air-gapped network that isn't reachable from the internet

When MonitorGiant is the clear choice

  • You don't want your monitoring to go down when your server goes down
  • You need multi-region verification — Uptime Kuma only checks from one location
  • You want monitoring that's set up in minutes with no server to provision or maintain
  • You manage multiple client organisations from a single account
  • You want Google OAuth for fast, secure team login
  • You need AI token monitoring, cloud cost tracking, or MCP health checks — Uptime Kuma has none of these
  • You run WordPress, WooCommerce, Ghost, Nextcloud, or other self-hosted platforms and need internal health checks beyond basic uptime

Migrating from Uptime Kuma?

Most teams move to MonitorGiant because they've hit one of three walls: their monitoring server became a single point of failure, they outgrew a single-region setup, or they need monitoring that extends to AI APIs, cloud costs, and platform health — things Uptime Kuma was never designed to cover. Setup takes minutes. No migration scripts needed.

Managed monitoring.
Zero server headaches.

25 monitors free. Multi-region checks. Instant email alerts. AI & Cloud monitoring and platform health checks for WordPress, WooCommerce, Ghost, Nextcloud & more — as paid add-ons.

Get started free →